I had heard and read very good things about THE SHAPE OF WATER (2017), the new movie by writer/director Guillermo del Toro, and since the inspiration behind del Toro making this movie was CREATURE FROM THE BLACK LAGOON (1954), one of my all-time favorite horror movies, I was eager to see this one, and admittedly, I had high expectations for it.
Sadly, those expectations were not met.
THE SHAPE OF WATER tells a poignant love story. Mute Elisa Esposito (Sally Hawkins) makes the best of her uneventful life in 1962 Baltimore. She enjoys a sweet friendship with her artist neighbor Giles (Richard Jenkins), a man struggling with his own aging process and who can’t hold a job, due as we learn later to a drinking problem, but he is tender and caring towards Elisa. When she leaves her apartment, she’s off to work as a janitor at a secret government laboratory, where her friend and fellow cleaner Zelda Fuller (Octavia Spencer) looks out for her.
When Colonel Richard Strickland (Michael Shannon) brings in an Amphibian Man (Doug Jones) he captured in the waters of South America and houses it in the part of the lab Elisa cleans, she finds herself instantly drawn to the creature and soon begins secretly meeting with it, as she quickly discovers that it is highly intelligent and can communicate with her. Since both she and the creature are mute, they immediately bond with each other, so much so, that in the classic Beauty and the Beast tradition, they fall in love.
This creative love story is the main story told in THE SHAPE OF WATER, and it’s the one that works. Everything about the relationship between Elisa and the creature worked for me, and it’s the best part of THE SHAPE OF WATER. But it’s everything else about this movie, from its supporting characters to its subplots that I found seriously lacking, and as such, dragged this movie down several notches.
One of the reasons the love story works so well is the tender performance by Sally Hawkins as Elisa. Even before she meets the creature, Elisa is a likable character, from the way she interacts with her friend Giles to the way she does her job. And when she connects with the creature, it’s a natural connection since in spite of her bright disposition, she still feels alone, without someone to love. More so, when suddenly the feelings between Elisa and the creature become deeper, I completely bought into the relationship, mostly because Sally Hawkins’ performance convinced me her feelings were genuine.
It’s an impressive performance by Hawkins, especially since she plays a character who cannot speak. She is probably the most expressive of any character in the movie. She’s certainly the most memorable character, and her performance is the best part of the movie.
The other reason the love story works is the writing by screenwriters Guillermo del Toro and Vanessa Taylor. The idea of taking an amphibious/human hybrid creature and showing off its intelligent and emotional side rather than turning it into just another movie monster, is a good one and one that I applaud. I enjoyed the Amphibian Man here, and I was completely into the love story between this creature and Elisa. Both the concept and the writing was refreshing and thought-provoking. My only wish is that they would have taken it even further and allowed us to learn even more about this mysterious creature from the sea.
And the Amphibian Man looks cool as well. However, as played by Doug Jones, I was certainly reminded of a very similar character Jones played in another Guillermo del Toro movie, Abe Sapien in HELLBOY II: THE GOLDEN ARMY (2008). The Amphibian Man here is clearly reminiscent of Abe Sapien, and so as much as I liked his look, it’s not entirely original.
Jones makes his living playing creatures and aliens, as he also played The Bye Bye Man in the dreadful horror movie THE BYE BYE MAN (2017), as well as the ghoul in OUIJA: ORIGIN OF EVIL (2016), among others. He currently stars as Saru in the latest Star Trek TV show, STAR TREK: DISCOVERY (2017-18), again hidden under extensive make-up. Jones is fine as the Amphibian Man, but it’s nothing I haven’t seen him do before.
But the rest of THE SHAPE OF WATER simply didn’t work for me. Neither the rest of the characters or storylines drew me in.
Michael Shannon’s villain Colonel Richard Strickland is far too one-dimensional to be convincing. He’s your standard military bad guy. Even scences showing him at home with his wife and kids do nothing to lighten his Neegan-like portrayal of a vicious, close-minded bully.
Now, Richard Jenkins’ Giles was a character that I did like, but the story spends far too much time on his back story, when he’s simply not as integral to the main plot as Elisa. During the first half of the movie, a lot of time is spent on his visits to a diner, because he’s attracted to the young man working there, and we follow him as he tries to get his job back. The point seems to be to show that like Elisa he’s a fellow outcast, but the story tends to meander off the main path and would have been better served to remain focused on Elisa and the creature. When the focus is on them, the movie is much more compelling.
Which brings me to the story. As much as liked the screenplay when it relayed the story of Elisa and the Amphibious Man, I found myself scratching my head about its other choices. The presence of Octavia Spencer in the role of Elisa’s friend Zelda immediately brought to mind Spencer’s work in THE HELP (2011) and HIDDEN FIGURES (2016), two superior films which dealt with racism.
THE SHAPE OF WATER also plays the race card, but only superficially. We see Octavia Spencer’s character dealing with it, and we also see a couple of other scenes showing prevalent racist attitudes in 1962. The point again seems to be that the cruelty which villain Richard Strickland shows the Amphibian Man wasn’t specific to rare aquatic creatures but to fellow humanity. But in this movie these scenes seem so out of place, I think mostly because one thing we do not see is Elisa’s reaction to them. It’s not part of her story, here.
Likewise, since it’s the height of the Cold War, Soviet spies are actively trying to steal U.S. secrets and are very interested in stealing the Amphibian Man from the Americans, and so we are introduced to as it turns out a sympathetic Soviet scientist Dr. Robert Hoffstetler (Michael Stuhlbarg) who, like Elisa, finds himself wanting to help the creature rather than turn it over to his Soviet contacts. But these scenes don’t really work either. Like the other subplots, they seem out of place and take away from the movie’s main focus, the love story.
I know this will sound like sacrilege to a lot of movie fans, but I’m not the biggest fan of Guillermo del Toro’s work. I loved both his HELLBOY movies, but for me, that’s about it. Even his well-regarded PAN’S LABRYNTH (2006) didn’t do a whole lot for me. So, in a way, I’m not really surprised I didn’t love THE SHAPE OF WATER. I’m just not a fan of the way del Toro tells a story.
That being said, the love story between Elisa and the Amphibian Man is touching and extremely well-done. It’s everything else in this movie that doesn’t really work for me.
To make the love story here the centerpiece of the movie, the supporting characters and story should be built around this main story in order to support it, but that’s not what happens here. Instead, the other characters and storylines seem out of place and do nothing but distract from the main and much better love story in the film.
As a result, THE SHAPE OF WATER is a mixed bag.
Its love story is exceptional. If only the rest of the movie had been the same.
Wow…sounds like the film is as much a plot mess as our own national plot is right now…Maybe it is too much Literary Criticism but I immediately thought this was going to be a treatise on how we are handling immigration and race issues in this country at present… Too bad it did not coalesce (or perhaps in light of our own infighting and disorganized emotions, perhaps it DID…)